The Paper Boats of Elisha Waters
                  (A 1949 Look at Composite Construction)
                  By John B. Ehrhardt
                  (Excerpted 
                  from Messing Around In Boats)
                  (click 
                  here for more information about MAIB)
                 One day in The 1860s, young George Waters of 
                  Troy, New York, received an invitation to a masquerade. There 
                  was nothing very unusual about that. Masquerades and young men 
                  have gone together since the dawn of history. However, this 
                  particular masquerade and this particular young man had a date 
                  with destiny and, if Mr. Waters had not had occasion to buy 
                  a mask, probably no one would ever have considered the zany 
                  idea of building boats of paper.
                 Mr. Waters found his mask. There were plenty 
                  of fancy masks for sale in Troy in those days. The only trouble 
                  was that their prices began at $8, quite an item in a young 
                  man's budget, even today in 1949 and more so in the 1860s when, 
                  we will remember, $500 per annum was not a bad salary for the 
                  head of a family. George Waters balked at the price. His father 
                  was a box manufacturer and he knew something of working in paper. 
                  Perhaps he could make his own mask. He could and did. History 
                  records nothing further of the masquerade and we must trust 
                  that a good time was had by all. But from his mask making young 
                  Waters learned that paper could be built up in layers to any 
                  form he wished and that the result was light, strong, and durable, 
                  just the stuff for boats, one would say, if only it were waterproof.
                
                 The boat idea took hold almost immediately. These 
                  were the great days of the oarsmen of America, single shell 
                  competitions, and the canoeing days of Rob Roy. Lighter and 
                  lighter, Finer and finer, were the cries that drove the designers 
                  onward. Single shells of cedar could be built down to a weight 
                  of 40 lbs. for a 28' boat of 13" beam. They were not very 
                  durable, one contact with a gravelly shoal could take the bottom 
                  out of them, but these cedar shells were fast. Still, could 
                  a 28' shell be lighter yet?
                 George thought so and his father Elisha thought 
                  the idea was worth a trial. The Waters bought up a disused cedar 
                  shell, set it bottom up to form a mold, laid layer after layer 
                  of manila paper over it, lapping the joints and bedding down 
                  in shellac as they went. When the formed paper was lifted from 
                  the mold it was provided with a pair of light spruce inwales 
                  and a pair of transverse bulkheads. This, plus the stem piece, 
                  was the only wood that entered into the construction. The paper 
                  was carefully waterproofed inside and out with varnish.
                 The finished craft weighed little more than 30 
                  lbs. and presented a smooth, seamless, almost friction-free 
                  surface to the water. Its performance suggested definite advantages 
                  over wooden construction (it was leak-proof and tough enough 
                  to withstand beaching), and accordingly the firm of Elisha Waters 
                  and Sons, while paper box manufacturers, applied for and received 
                  American and Canadian patents on the manufacture of paper boats.
                 In the year 1867 the firm began large scale production 
                  of paper racing shells. The old cedar hull was discarded in 
                  favor of a solid wooden mold with rabbets cut to receive the 
                  wooden inwales and stem pieces. By this arrangement it became 
                  possible to set the wooden parts in place before the first layer 
                  of paper was applied and they could accordingly be incorporated 
                  in the paper skin, giving a true monococque construction. The 
                  adhesive continued to be shellac, but with constant refinements 
                  the weight of a single shell, 28' long and 12" wide, complete 
                  with sliding seat and outriggers, was lowered to less than 22 
                  lbs.
                 Moreover the boats were strong. One Waters shell 
                  was placed on trestles 8' apart and a 140 lb. man was lowered 
                  into the cockpit which was midway between the trestles. The 
                  boat merely buckled slightly under his weight, 1/16" out 
                  of horizontal to be precise. The drive of competition soon conquered 
                  the oarsmen's inherent conservatism. By 1870 the paper boat 
                  was an established factor in all important races. Indeed, a 
                  single shell match that pitted one paper boat against a field 
                  of cedar shells was pretty much like the road races of the early 
                  1900s when a steam car was entered against a field of gas buggies. 
                  It was essentially a contest among the cedar boats for the privilege 
                  of finishing second.
                 In 1876, for instance, the Waters' boats hung 
                  up the freshman and varsity Intercollegiate, the Saratoga International 
                  in singles, doubles, and fours, the national championships of 
                  the National Asseciation of American Oarsmen (singles, doubles, 
                  and fours), the world championships at the 1876 Centennial Exposition 
                  (singles, doubles, and fours likewise), plus the professional 
                  championship of the United States. By this time, it will be 
                  noted, the firm was building a complete line of racing shells 
                  plus at least one type of cruising boat. Comell had adapted 
                  the paper boats for varsity work and the Waters outfit was sitting 
                  on top of the world.
                 Probably their biggest boost came from the now 
                  forgotten Natty (Nathaniel H.) Bishop of Toms River, New Jersey), 
                  a leading sportsman and adventurer of the day. Natty had begun 
                  his career with a solo hike across South America in the 1850s. 
                  In the 1870s, no longer young, he made a solo voyage down the 
                  Mississippi in a 12' Bamegat sneakbox and another solo (in 1874, 
                  to be precise) from Troy, New York, to Cedar Keys, Florida, 
                  with one of Waters' paper canoes.
                 The stock paper canoe was something of the Nautilus 
                  model. The 1860s had seen the Rob Roy books with their impelling 
                  gospel of the kayak canoe. The slim, round bottomed Rob Roy 
                  had been tried here and abroad with varying favor. She was a 
                  canoeman's canoe, fast, easy to paddle, stiff to sail, but cramped 
                  and not too safe in the hands of the beginner. The Rev. H.G. 
                  Baden Powell (father of Scouting's Baden Powell) had developed 
                  a modification of the Rob Roy which he dubbed Nautilus. This 
                  design was standard with canoe clubs in and around New York 
                  City in the 1870s and was adopted by the Troy firm as their 
                  own.
                 The stock canoe was 14' long, 28" wide, 
                  and 9" deep amidships. It had a paper skin 1/8" thick 
                  (some of the racing shells had a skin 1/12" thick) and 
                  weighed 58 lbs. Nautilus had a leg o'mutton ketch rig as well 
                  as both oars and paddles. She was decked about one quarter the 
                  distance from bow and stern and was built with considerable 
                  sheer. Under ordinary conditions she was self-righting. It was 
                  one of these boats that Bishop took on its own bottom from Troy 
                  to Cedar Keys. He abandoned his sails at Philadelphia and rowed 
                  or paddled the rest of the way, using oars in open water, paddles 
                  in small streams.
                 From Troy he sailed down the Hudson River to 
                  New York, then through New York Harbor to the Delaware and Raritan 
                  Canal, which venerable waterway some yachtsmen not too grizzled 
                  today will remember with no fondness. This canal was more or 
                  less open to large cruisers as recently as 1933 and is .still 
                  passable by canoe in 1949.
                 From the Delaware and Raritan, Bishop went down 
                  the Delaware to Philadelphia and into Delaware Bay. Here he 
                  had his only mishap, a capsize in a squall near the capes where 
                  the bay is almost 16 miles wide. The paper canoe righted herself 
                  and floated, though swamped. Bishop got his boat and gear ashore, 
                  though the paper skin took quite a pounding on the oyster shell 
                  beach before the craft was hauled clear of the breakers and 
                  emptied. The next day the skin was examined but showed only 
                  a few scratches which were promptly filled with shellac. Bishop 
                  remarks that his light 300 lb. all wood canoe would have been 
                  reduced to matchwood under similar conditions.
                 From the Delaware he proceeded to the Chesapeake, 
                  thence through the Dismal Swamp Canal and Hatteras Sound and 
                  (with some portages) by inland rivers to the Gulf of Mexico 
                  at Cedar Keys. He had consumed five months on the voyage, the 
                  paper boat had never been out of water more than three days 
                  at a time, and its paper covering, barring a few chips and scratches, 
                  was as good as the day it had left the factory.
                Bishop's writings in the contemporary press and 
                  in his published books (a favorite Sunday School prize in those 
                  days) gave the Waters firm a further boost. The year 1876 was 
                  their high spot, but it was also the year of doom. We have seen 
                  the number of trophies won in competition that year. The same 
                  year saw Bishop's boat exhibited at the Centennial, and many 
                  boat clubs along the Hudson River had 30 and 40 paper boats 
                  on their racks. But in the same year the factory at Troy burned. 
                  There were attempts to revive the industry after the fire but 
                  the firm did not long survive, and since the Waters family still 
                  held tightly to their patents, the process languished and sank 
                  into oblivion.
                 Several things must occur to the modern yachtsman 
                  as he reads this. For one thing, the advantages of lightness 
                  and strength, freedom from corrosion and ease of repair offered 
                  by laminated paper construction are still valuable features. 
                  For another, we have better laminating adhesives than shellac 
                  today. Modern plastic chemists tell us that shellac was the 
                  first modern plastic. Its use was known to Europeans as early 
                  as the 13th century (much earlier to Orientals) and it is reasonably 
                  waterproof. However, shellac gets lazy with age and its properties 
                  are likely to vary from batch to batch. Our modern phenolic 
                  resins have none of these troubles and are cheaper as well.
                 This writer has been experimenting with paper 
                  laminates and, while the first boat is still unfinished, the 
                  preliminary experiments will be of interest to the amateur builder. 
                  Test panels of phenolic resin bonded laminates were made up 
                  before actual construction was started and the results with 
                  these have been amazing.
                 The standard test panels have been 12" x 
                  12" all made up of one ply of 1/32" bristol board 
                  overlaid with six plies of .012" manila paper. Laminating 
                  resins tried have been L.W. Ferdinand's Stanzall, Borden's Cascophen, 
                  and Weldwood glue. Results with all three have been equivalent, 
                  though we found Cascophen by far the easiest to handle (the 
                  mixture is never lumpy). The completed panels weigh 8 oz. after 
                  coating both surfaces and all edges with three applications 
                  of spar varnish. This weight of 1/2-lb. per square foot means 
                  that a 14' canoe, a 12' duckboat, or a 10' dinghy can be built 
                  over a wooden frame to give a completed weight of less than 
                  50 lbs.
                 The test panels were soaked in water for 30 days 
                  with no delamination. Next we gave them a month of soaking and 
                  drying on alternate days, still with no delamination and no 
                  warping. Finally we allowed them to weather for three months, 
                  at the end of which time there was no change in physical properties.
                 For strength we tried them with a 3 lb. axe. 
                  The ax, swung against the edge of a panel, crushes but does 
                  not split. Swung against the flat surface of the panel, it punctures 
                  but never makes a hole more than 3" long. The punctures 
                  can be repaired by pushing out the dent (the hole all but seals 
                  itself) and then pasting two layers of paper over the damage 
                  at either side. For this, shellac (the kind sold as rim and 
                  gasket cement) must be used. Resin glues will not make a durable 
                  repair since the setting of the laminating adhesive in the paper 
                  destroys its porosity and makes the further use of synthetic 
                  resins impossible.
                It is obvious, of course, that this method of 
                  construction offers no advantages in cheapness, lightlless, 
                  or durabilty over the plastic, plywood, or aluminum boats now 
                  available. Its one advantage is that it is the only type of 
                  seamless monococque construction practicable for the private 
                  builder.
                 Since the Waters technique of a solid wood mold 
                  is undesirable in home construction, we settled on a light wooden 
                  frame similar to the kayak frame though, since the paper skin 
                  adds stiffness which the canvas covering of the kayak lacks, 
                  some of the longitudinal members may be omitted. The mold to 
                  which the paper is applied serves also as the permanent frame 
                  of the boat. Over the frame we place a layer of 1/32" unglazed 
                  bristol board, set in waterproof glue and lightly tacked to 
                  the frame. We use the glue sparingly, we cannot permit the pores 
                  of the bristol board to become completely filled. When the frame 
                  is fully clothed with paper board we are ready to apply the 
                  manila paper.
                 The paper must be laid up all at once since, 
                  as we have seen, additional plies cannot be added after the 
                  first glue line sets. First coat the bristol board with glue, 
                  then lay down the first layer of paper parallel with the keel. 
                  Avoid paper wider than 18" since it is difficult to handle. 
                  Lap the paper generously at keel, stem pieces, and chines and 
                  press down firmly with the hands. It will stick as quickly as 
                  a postage stamp.
                 Next coat again with glue, lay up the next ply 
                  athwartships, lapping fully at bow, stern, chines, and keel 
                  as before. The next two layers should be laid up diagonally 
                  from the keel, the final two most anyway that is found convenient. 
                  No pressure other than firm hand pressure is required in smoothing 
                  down the plies. There is no need to weight the plies while the 
                  glue is curing. Why lay up the layers in different directions? 
                  Because paper (machine made paper) has grain the same as wood. 
                  By laying the grain in several directions we achieve maximum 
                  strength.
                 The finished hull should be allowed to cure for 
                  48 hours before filling with paint or varnish, then give it 
                  three coats inside and out. The paper can then be sanded the 
                  same as wood. Slight cockling of the paper near the edges of 
                  the outer ply may be observed. This can be sanded down without 
                  materially affecting the fabric.
                 The arithmetic of a 14' canoe is roughly this: 
                  plywood and spruce frame (with fastenings), about 25 lbs. and 
                  $20; Bristol board and paper, about 17 Ibs. and $6; Resorcinol 
                  glue (Cascophen) about $10. Therefore, a seamless leakproofboat 
                  of 50 Ibs. costs about $40.
                 This method of building seems to be the answer 
                  to Mr. Herreshoff's very valid objections to ordinary kayak 
                  construction. The frame does not stick through the covering 
                  like the ribs of a starved puppy, the paper covering adds stiffness 
                  and strength and, quite as important, it adds buoyancy. The 
                  test panels floated for several days before they absorbed enough 
                  water to sink and Bishop's boat, we remember, floated even when 
                  swamped. The method seems thoroughly practical for canoes, yacht 
                  tenders, duckboats, and sailing dinghies, for any boat that 
                  must be light, strong and leakproof. We cannot recommend it 
                  for boats that will remain in the water for long periods of 
                  time. In a few days the paper will absorb close to its own weight 
                  in water.